Sexual Autonomy Offenses
Defense in offenses against sexual autonomy, including forcible sexual intercourse, forcible indecency, sexual intercourse by abuse of authority, and opportunistic sexual intercourse, to secure fair process and protect clients' rights.
Sexual Autonomy Offenses: Frequently Asked Questions
I am accused of sexual assault but the encounter was consensual — how do I protect myself?
Immediately preserve messages and records of your interactions that show consent, and have a lawyer present from the first police interview. These cases often come down to conflicting accounts, so consistency of statements and corroborating evidence are decisive.
What should I be careful about during a sexual offense investigation?
Never contact the complainant privately — it can create new charges or be seen as witness tampering and lead to detention. All contact, apologies, or settlement talks should go through your lawyer.
What is the difference between indecent assault and sexual harassment?
Forcible indecency is a serious Criminal Code offense committed against a person's will, while offenses under the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act carry lighter penalties. The line between them is a frequent focus of the defense and greatly affects sentencing.
Related Case Results
Selected case results in Sexual Autonomy Offenses
Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)
Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Sexual autonomy offense», we defended against forcible sexual intercourse allegations; investigation closed with a non-prosecution (不起訴) decision.
Handling attorney:謝政翰
Need expert help with Sexual Autonomy Offenses?
Contact our team now for a solution tailored to your situation