Public Safety OffensesNon-prosecution

Offense against public order — non-prosecution (不起訴)

Non-prosecution (不起訴) decision
Handling attorney:謝政翰
Case Overview

Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Offense against public order», we defended defendants alleged to have disturbed public order after a minor dispute among friends; investigation closed with non-prosecution (不起訴).

Background

The caption listed disturbance of public order. Police accepted the report and summoned parties for investigation; the file described a minor quarrel. Authorities initially treated the conduct as joint disturbance of order, but the prosecutor ultimately found insufficient suspicion.

Defense Strategy

Our attorneys presented the facts, explaining the minor dispute, limited harm to legal interests, and requested non-prosecution (不起訴).

Key Issues
  • Was there joint criminal intent?
  • Was this merely a private dispute?
  • Does evidence meet the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt?
Legal Basis & Argument

Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 154(2), Art. 253(1); elements must be assessed from the case file.

Disposition

The prosecutor found insufficient suspicion and issued a non-prosecution (不起訴) decision.

Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)
Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)
Click to enlarge

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.

Related Tags

Public orderNon-prosecution (不起訴)
Handling Attorneys

謝政翰

Managing Attorney

Criminal defenseFinancial crimesCivil–criminal crossover disputes

These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.