Fraud DefenseNon-prosecution

Fraud and related offenses — non-prosecution (不起訴) (cryptocurrency)

Non-prosecution (不起訴) decision
Handling attorney:謝政翰
Case Overview

Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Fraud and related offenses», we defended against allegations of providing a company account and converting cryptocurrency in fraud and money laundering; non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.

Background

The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. The defendant was alleged to conspire with a fraud ring, receive illicit funds in a company account, withdraw per instructions, and convert to cryptocurrency to break the money trail.

Defense Strategy

Our attorneys argued lack of knowledge, nominal account-holder status, and weaknesses in financial-flow evidence.

Key Issues
  • Joint intent for money laundering and fraud?
  • Authorized company account use?
  • Can crypto conversion infer criminal intent?
Legal Basis & Argument

Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 339(1); Taiwan Anti-Money Laundering Act; Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 253(1).

Disposition

The prosecutor found insufficient suspicion and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).

Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.

Related Tags

FraudMoney launderingCryptocurrencyNon-prosecution (不起訴)
Handling Attorneys

謝政翰

Managing Attorney

Criminal defenseFinancial crimesCivil–criminal crossover disputes
View Attorney Profile

These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.