Usury offense — non-prosecution (不起訴)
Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Usury offense», we defended against usury allegations based on LINE loan advertisements; non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.
The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. The defendant was alleged to lend via LINE to unspecified persons at interest far exceeding principal; the complainant claimed usury harm.
Our attorneys addressed usury elements, actual interest calculations, and loan agreement validity.
- Does interest exceed statutory usury limits?
- Is the loan agreement valid?
- Civil debt dispute only?
Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 344 (usury); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 253(1).
The prosecutor found insufficient suspicion and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).
* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.
Related Tags
These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.