Drug CasesNon-prosecution

Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act — non-prosecution (不起訴)

Non-prosecution (不起訴) decision
Handling attorney:謝政翰、林宗諺
Case Overview

Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act offense», after observation and rehabilitation, we assisted the defendant with evaluation materials and obtained non-prosecution (不起訴).

Background

The defendant used Schedule II methamphetamine at a venue, was seized by police, and tested positive on urinalysis; was ordered to observation and rehabilitation.

Defense Strategy

Our attorneys helped complete rehabilitation and submitted an institution assessment of «no continuing tendency to use drugs», requesting non-prosecution (不起訴) under Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act Art. 20(2).

Key Issues
  • No continuing use tendency after observation/rehabilitation?
  • Statutory requirements for non-prosecution (不起訴) met?
Legal Basis & Argument

Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act Art. 10, Art. 20(2); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 255(1).

Disposition

The prosecutor found no continuing use tendency and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).

Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)
Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)
Click to enlarge

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.

Related Tags

Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention ActMethamphetamineObservation and rehabilitationNon-prosecution (不起訴)
Handling Attorneys

謝政翰

Managing Attorney

Criminal defenseFinancial crimesCivil–criminal crossover disputes

林宗諺

Attorney

Criminal defenseFraud casesDrug casesTaiwan Anti-Money Laundering Act

These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.