Attempted sale of Schedule III drugs — non-prosecution (不起訴)

Police undercover purchase of 5 grams of ketamine; defendant alleged attempted sale of Schedule III drugs; defendant denied knowledge of transaction contents.

Our attorneys argued single-source evidence was insufficient to prove sale and requested non-prosecution (不起訴).

• Does undercover buy prove defendant personally sold?
• Are communication records sufficient corroboration?
• Can attempted-sale intent be established?

Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act Art. 4(3), Art. 6; Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 154(2), Art. 253(1).

The prosecutor found insufficient evidence and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).

Click to enlarge

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.