Fraud — non-prosecution (不起訴)
Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Fraud offense», we defended allegations of joining a fraud ring and using the LINE nickname «Caroline»; non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.
The first page lists Defendant A's appointed counsel as Attorney 謝政翰 and Defendant B's as Attorney 林宗諺. The complainant alleged joint commission of Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 339-4 (fraud by three or more persons) with LINE coordination.
Our attorneys challenged participation level, account use, and communications, arguing insufficient proof of intent.
- Proof defendant was a ring member?
- Can LINE records infer intent?
- Does three-or-more-person fraud apply?
Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 339(1), Art. 339-4; Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 253(1).
The prosecutor found insufficient suspicion and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).
* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.
Related Tags
These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.