Sale of Schedule II drugs — non-prosecution (不起訴) (cannabis)
Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Violation of Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act», we defended alleged sale of Schedule II cannabis; non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.
The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. Police alleged sales of 50 grams of cannabis for NT$ 50,000 and NT$ 47,000; the defendant consistently denied.
Our attorneys invoked in dubio pro reo and evidentiary rules, arguing witness statements and communications were insufficient to prove sale.
- Sufficient evidence of sale intent?
- Link between transaction records and defendant?
Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act Art. 4(2); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 154(2), Art. 253(1).
The prosecutor issued non-prosecution (不起訴).
* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.
Related Tags
These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.