Aiding fraudulently obtaining property — non-prosecution (不起訴)
Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Fraud offense», we defended aiding fraudulently obtaining property (Thai baht exchange); non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.
The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. The complainant alleged the defendant provided an account for others to defraud victims exchanging Thai baht for NT$; NT$ 30,000 was wired but no baht received.
Our attorneys argued the defendant only assisted lawful friend exchange without aiding fraud intent; no affirmative evidence in the file.
- Aiding fraudulently obtaining property established?
- Link between account provision and fraud result?
Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 30(1), Art. 339(1); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 253(1).
The prosecutor found no evidence of aiding fraud intent and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).
* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.
Related Tags
These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.