Fraud — non-prosecution (不起訴) (cryptocurrency)
Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Fraud offense», we defended fraudulently obtaining property (BTC/ETH investment); non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.
The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. The complainant alleged the defendant, as company principal, induced cryptocurrency investment of NT$ 630,000 with principal guarantee and periodic returns, then refused repayment at maturity.
Our attorneys argued an investment-performance dispute lacking subjective fraud intent and objective deceptive acts.
- Fraudulently obtaining property established?
- Does principal guarantee constitute criminal deception?
Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 339(1); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 154(2), Art. 253(1).
The prosecutor found insufficient evidence and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).
* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.
Related Tags
These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.