Fraud — non-prosecution (不起訴) (assisting collection)

The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. The complainant was defrauded via LINE to buy Pu-erh tea and wired funds to the defendant's account; the defendant denied intent, claiming assistance for a colleague's tea business.

Our attorneys argued no affirmative evidence the defendant knowingly joined a fraud ring and requested non-prosecution (不起訴).

• Did the defendant have fraud intent?
• Does assisting collection constitute complicity?

Taiwan Criminal Code Art. 339(1); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 154(2), Art. 253(1).

The prosecutor found insufficient evidence and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).

Click to enlarge

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.