Property CrimesDeferred prosecution

Taiwan Animal Drug Control Act offense — deferred prosecution (緩起訴)

Deferred prosecution (緩起訴) decision
Handling attorney:謝政翰、林宗諺
Case Overview

Under the deferred prosecution (緩起訴) decision caption «Taiwan Animal Drug Control Act offense», we defended negligent sale of prohibited veterinary drugs; deferred prosecution (緩起訴) granted.

Background

The first page lists appointed counsel Attorneys 謝政翰 and 林宗諺. The defendant sold unlicensed imported veterinary prohibited drugs on Shopee; admitted failure to verify sources; file cites Taiwan Animal Drug Control Act Art. 5(1)(1) prohibited drugs.

Defense Strategy

Our attorneys addressed negligence, post-offense attitude, and deferred prosecution (緩起訴) requirements, requesting leniency.

Key Issues
  • Negligent sale of prohibited drugs established?
  • Deferred prosecution (緩起訴) requirements met?
Legal Basis & Argument

Taiwan Animal Drug Control Act Art. 35(3), Art. 5(1)(1); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 253-1 (deferred prosecution (緩起訴)).

Disposition

The prosecutor granted deferred prosecution (緩起訴).

Deferred Prosecution Agreement (personal data redacted)
Deferred Prosecution Agreement (personal data redacted)
Click to enlarge

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Deferred Prosecution Agreement (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.

Related Tags

Taiwan Animal Drug Control ActNegligent prohibited drug saleShopeeDeferred prosecution (緩起訴)
Handling Attorneys

謝政翰

Managing Attorney

Criminal defenseFinancial crimesCivil–criminal crossover disputes

林宗諺

Attorney

Criminal defenseFraud casesDrug casesTaiwan Anti-Money Laundering Act

These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.