Drug CasesNon-prosecution

Sale of Schedule III drugs — non-prosecution (不起訴)

Non-prosecution (不起訴) decision

Handling attorney:謝政翰、林宗諺

Case Overview

Under the non-prosecution (不起訴) decision caption «Violation of Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act», we defended alleged sale of Schedule III drugs (coffee packets); non-prosecution (不起訴) obtained.

Background

The defendant was alleged to sell Schedule III drug coffee packets via Telegram (approx. 50.9 grams, NT$ 4,100); the defendant denied.

Defense Strategy

Our attorneys argued a single buyer's statement was insufficient to prove sale and requested non-prosecution (不起訴).

Key Issues

Does evidence meet proof beyond reasonable doubt?
Can Telegram records corroborate?

Legal Basis & Argument

Taiwan Drug Hazard Prevention Act Art. 4(3), Art. 2(2)(3); Taiwan Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 154(2), Art. 253(1).

Disposition

The prosecutor found insufficient evidence and issued non-prosecution (不起訴).

Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted)

Click to enlarge

* Personal data such as names and ID numbers in this Decision of Non-Prosecution (personal data redacted) has been redacted in accordance with Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act * Document images are official Traditional Chinese legal papers; the original text controls.

Related Tags

Schedule III drugsCoffee packetsTaiwan Drug Hazard Prevention ActNon-prosecution (不起訴)

Handling Attorneys

謝政翰

Managing Attorney

Criminal defenseFinancial crimesCivil–criminal crossover disputes

林宗諺

Attorney

Criminal defenseFraud casesDrug casesTaiwan Anti-Money Laundering Act

These summaries are for reference only. Actual outcomes depend on the facts and evidence of each case.